Our Visiting Scholar, Philosopher Anselm Mueller, considers the traditional opposition between acting well and faring well, and the kinds of steps that thinkers in different cultural settings have taken to address it. He gave this talk at the Neubauer Collegium for Culture and Society at the University of Chicago on April 11, 2016.
Photos by Valerie Wallace. For more photos from our events, visit our Flickr page.
“What Do We Live For?” Lecture by Anselm Mueller
4 pm, April 11, 2016 | University of Chicago | The Neubauer Collegium for Culture and Society
For those unable to make this event, you can watch it on live our website https://virtue.uchicago.edu/april11
Ethical conduct is not without its costs—delivering truthful testimony against well-connected murderers in a criminal trial can be dangerous; delivering bad news to good people is painful; facing down and working through a mountain of debt can require tightening your belt in unpleasant ways; and duly courageous action can get you killed. Unethical conduct, on the other hand, often promises ease, comfort, wealth, and some important forms of success. Points such as these have led many thinkers to notice that there seems to be a tension between acting well (the stuff of ethical conduct) and faring well (getting things that people generally want to get, and finding ways of holding onto those things).
In this lecture, Anselm Müller will consider the traditional opposition between acting well and faring well, and the kinds of steps that thinkers in different cultural settings have taken to address it. Some urge that meaningful lives are primarily those centered on pursuit of ethical perfection. Others urge that the best lives are directed to faring well (sometimes in ways that have nothing to do with satisfying desires for wealth or ease or comfort). And a few urge that there is no such thing as really faring well unless one also is devoted to acting well. How are we to understand these responses to the traditional problem? Which, if any, look like sound ways of addressing the tension?
Anselm Mueller is Professor Emeritus, University of Trier, and a Visiting Scholar with Virtue, Happiness, and the Meaning of Life and the Department of Philosophy. A student of Elizabeth Anscombe and Anthony Kenny at Oxford in the early sixties, Professor Müller has taught philosophy at Oxford University, Australian National University, University of Trier, University of Luxemborg, and Keimyung University. He has written many books and articles in the following areas: ethics, rationality, action theory, philosophy of mind, and the history of philosophy.
For more details, visit: https://virtue.uchicago.edu/april11
Our Visiting Scholar Program is hosted by the Neubauer Collegeium for Culture and Society and made possible by a grant from the Chicago Moral Project. This talk is also made possible by generous support from the John Templeton Foundation.
Our visiting scholar Anselm Mueller will present a public lecture “What Do We Live For?” at the Neubauer Collegium at 4pm on April 11, 2016. As space is limited, we ask that you RSVP a spot.
4 pm, April 11, 2016
Neubauer Collegium 5701 S. Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, IL
Reception to follow.
Ethical conduct is not without its costs—delivering truthful testimony against well-connected murderers in a criminal trial can be dangerous; delivering bad news to good people is painful; facing down and working through a mountain of debt can require tightening your belt in unpleasant ways; and duly courageous action can get you killed. Unethical conduct, on the other hand, often promises ease, comfort, wealth, and some important forms of success. Points such as these have led many thinkers to notice that there seems to be a tension between acting well (the stuff of ethical conduct) and faring well (getting things that people generally want to get, and finding ways of holding onto those things). In this lecture, Anselm Müller will consider the traditional opposition between acting well and faring well, and the kinds of steps that thinkers in different cultural settings have taken to address it. Some urge that meaningful lives are primarily those centered on pursuit of ethical perfection. Others urge that the best lives are directed to faring well (sometimes in ways that have nothing to do with satisfying desires for wealth or ease or comfort). And a few urge that there is no such thing as really faring well unless one also is devoted to acting well. How are we to understand these responses to the traditional problem? Which, if any, look like sound ways of addressing the tension?
 |
Anselm Mueller is Professor Emeritus, University of Trier, and a Visiting Professor with the Department of Philosophy and the project “Virtue, Happiness, and the Meaning of Life”. A student of Elizabeth Anscombe and Anthony Kenny at Oxford in the early sixties, Professor Müller has taught philosophy at Oxford University, Australian National University, University of Trier, University of Luxemborg, and Keimyung University. He has written many books and articles in the following areas: ethics, rationality, action theory, philosophy of mind, and the history of philosophy. |
This lecture is hosted by Neubauer Collegeium for Culture and Society and supported by a generous grant from the John Templeton Foundation.